Gaslighting Openness
Summary
Armin Ronacher, a longtime Open Source advocate, argues that the openness he believes in is under threat not just from technical and economic pressures but from a deliberate manipulation of the narrative. He contends that opinion makers increasingly frame open access as irresponsible, and that companies reframe their own gatekeeping as being for users' safety and security. He cites the EU's DMA and Apple's delayed AI features in Europe as a case where the real issue is whether users control their own devices and data, not Brussels overreach. He extends this to AI labs like Anthropic, which trained on public works yet wrap restrictions on distilling their models in safety and national-security language. His conclusion is that democratized access to technology is in everyone's interest, and some temporary product pain is worth paying to keep the gates open. He warns Europeans especially not to cede the narrative that restricting access serves their interests.
Key Insight
The gravest threat to openness is rhetorical: companies are winning by reframing their gatekeeping as protection, and defending access means refusing to cede that narrative.
Spicy Quotes (click to share)
- 7
Control is safety. Openness is danger.
- 6
I'm a true believer in the idea that Open Source always wins in the long run, but not automatically and not quickly.
- 6
A lot of that battle today is manipulation of the narrative.
- 5
Opinion makers on social media and in business circles increasingly frame access as irresponsibility.
- 7
The phone is yours, the data is yours, yet Apple decides who may reach it and takes the agency away from you and then tries to make that sound like it is in your interest.
- 7
They trained their models on public works, then block Open Source attempts to learn from and distill these systems.
- 6
We should not let companies own the narrative that preventing access is in our interest.
- 6
Some temporary product pain, including delayed Apple AI features, will be worth paying if it keeps gates open.
Tone
critical, opinionated
